AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT evaluate: Not even price listing worth

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT review: Not even worth list

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

MSRP $199.00

“The AMD RX 6500 XT is a big disappointment in nearly each approach.”


Some fashions can be found close to listing worth

Technically helps ray tracing


Disappointing gaming efficiency, even at 1080p

Horrible ray tracing efficiency

4GB is an issue in a number of video games

PCIe bottleneck locks out older

Outclassed by from practically 5 years in the past

The RX 6500 XT isn’t good. You most likely already know that from the dogpile that occurred when AMD launched the cardboard. RX 6500 XT evaluations present efficiency that’s worse than playing cards which can be a number of years outdated, and my evaluate is not any totally different.

However you would possibly nonetheless really feel tempted. You’ll be able to really discover RX 6500 XT fashions at Newegg, Micro Middle, and Amazon for round $50 above listing worth. Amid the GPU scarcity, that’s extraordinary. Even so, you shouldn’t purchase the RX 6500 XT. It’s not within the operating for the most effective graphics playing cards, and if something, it’s within the operating for one of many worst tech merchandise launched to this point this 12 months.


The back of the AMD RX 6500 XT.Jacob Roach / Digital Traits

In comparison with the opposite finances choices from AMD proper now, the RX 6500 XT is significantly reduce down. It has half of the cores of the RX 6600 XT and half the video reminiscence, although it runs a hair quicker with clock pace. The principle points are reminiscence and PCIe bandwidth.

RX 6500 XT
RX 6600
RX 6600 XT


Increase pace

Reminiscence capability

Reminiscence bandwidth

PCIe interface
PCIe x4
PCIe x8
PCIe x8

Energy draw

Merely put, 4GB will not be sufficient for gaming in 2022. The RTX 3050 comes with 8GB, and a step as much as the RX 6600 will get you that very same quantity. Worse, the restricted reminiscence is squeezed via a microscopic bus, making a nasty bottleneck that just about halves the reminiscence bandwidth of the RX 6600 XT.

My testing reveals important bottlenecks because of the PCIe configuration.

For the PCIe interface, I’m simply asking: Why? The RX 6500 XT helps PCIe, but it surely’s restricted to 4 lanes. The RX 6600 helps eight lanes with none subject, as does the RTX 3050. There’s no motive to restrict the RX 6500 XT to 4 lanes. Most consumers will nonetheless be utilizing PCIe, and my testing reveals some important bottlenecks because of the four-lane configuration.

Gaming efficiency

AMD RX 6500 XT installed in a PC.Jacob Roach / Digital Traits

The RX 6500 XT is past disappointing. It’s insulting. Since launch, we’ve discovered that it’s a laptop computer GPU with a cooler strapped on prime, and that reveals clearly from my outcomes. I might go over the variations and the the reason why the RX 6500 XT is such a poor performer, attempting to drum up some worth proposition.

However that doesn’t matter. All you have to know is that the RX 6500 XT feels horrible to make use of.

RTX 3050
RX 6500 XT
RX 6600
RX 580

3DMark Time Spy 

3DMark Hearth Strike

Crimson Useless Redemption 2
52 fps
51 fps
59 fps
35 fps

79 fps
70 fps
98 fps
56 fps

Murderer’s Creed Valhalla
55 fps
31 fps
71 fps
42 fps

Battlefield V
92 fps
93 fps
120 fps
74 fps

Cyberpunk 2077
47 fps
29 fps
46 fps

58 fps
40 fps
67 fps

Murderer’s Creed Valhalla (PCIe
19 fps

Crimson Useless Redemption 2 (PCIe
49 fps

Simply so it’s clear, the outcomes above are at 1080p with the best graphics preset. I ran my exams with a Ryzen 9 5950X and 32GB of DDR4-3200 reminiscence. That is speculated to be a 1080p graphics card, however even then, it struggles.

The efficiency is tough, sometimes falling behind even the RX 580 (which launched practically 5 years in the past for a similar worth). Extra importantly, the gameplay expertise is tough. In Battlefield V, I skilled constant stuttering when transitioning into gameplay, and on a number of events, I noticed fashions visibly stream in after the sport had already loaded.

The visible bugs don’t come near touching the reminiscence points.

In a number of instances, I noticed flickering points, too. In Battlefield V, the fashions would flicker for a number of seconds whereas they loaded in. In Management, the complete display would flicker between white and black for about 20 seconds earlier than launching. These affected by epilepsy have but one more reason to avoid the RX 6500 XT.

The visible bugs don’t come near touching the reminiscence points. My outcomes are in 1080p, however I ran the RX 6500 XT via the spectrum of widespread resolutions. I wasn’t in a position to run the 1440p or 4K exams in Crimson Useless Redemption 2 as a result of the sport features a built-in reminiscence limiter. It’s not the one one, and the RX 6500 XT will run into reminiscence points in different video games.

Murderer’s Creed Valhalla is a major instance of that. At 1080p, the sport referred to as for 6GB of video reminiscence, 2GB over what the RX 6500 XT has. Your body fee in these conditions is locked to how shortly the cardboard can fill and flush reminiscence, making a bottleneck that locks your body fee in a single spot.

AMD RX 6500 XT on top of other graphics cards.Jacob Roach / Digital Traits

To make issues worse, the PCIe interface limits you. It solely occupies 4 PCIe lanes, whereas most graphics playing cards, together with the RX 580, occupy the total 16. It’s not an issue on PCIe, however that’s solely accessible on the newest AMD and Intel platforms. The overwhelming majority of individuals will use the RX 6500 XT with PCIe

And with even worse efficiency. Generally it’s a number of frames, as is the case in Crimson Useless Redemption 2, and different instances, it drops off a cliff (see Murderer’s Creed Valhalla). I didn’t even hassle testing the opposite playing cards with PCIe None of them have an asinine design that inexplicably cuts the bandwidth right down to 1 / 4 of what’s accessible.

Content material creation efficiency

AMD RX 6500 XT installed in a PC.Jacob Roach / Digital Traits

It’s no shock, however the RX 6500 XT is horrible for content material creation workloads, constantly falling behind the RTX 3050, and in some instances, even the RX 580. AMD playing cards aren’t nicely geared up for 3D rendering in comparison with Nvidia’s proprietary CUDA and Optix rendering APIs, which stacks on prime of the restricted efficiency of the RX 6500 XT.

RTX 3050
RX 6500 XT
RX 6600
RX 580

Blender BMW (decrease is best)
76 seconds
151 seconds
86 seconds
168 seconds

Blender Classroom (decrease is best)
279 seconds
293 seconds
167 seconds
370 seconds

Blender Koro (decrease is best)
227 seconds
263 seconds
156 seconds

Pugetbench for Premiere Professional

Then once more, there isn’t a graphics card across the similar worth because the RX 6500 XT that does content material creation nicely. The issue with AMD’s newest launch is that it’s significantly worse than even the bottom performer.

Ray tracing

AMD RX 6500 XT sitting among other graphics cards.Jacob Roach / Digital Traits

The RX 6500 XT is a ray tracing succesful GPU, at the very least in keeping with AMD. Based mostly on my outcomes, that declare is disingenuous at finest, and downright inaccurate at worst. Not solely does the poor efficiency of the RX 6500 XT push ray tracing out of attain, some video games might not even run with it turned on.

RX 6500 XT
RTX 3050
RX 6600

Guardians of the Galaxy (no RT)
21 fps

Guardians of the Galaxy (Excessive RT)
6 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 (no RT)
29 fps
47 fps
46 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 (Extremely RT)
6 fps
23 fps
10 fps

I usually use Cyberpunk 2077 and Management for my ray tracing exams, however that wasn’t potential with the RX 6500 XT. Management, regardless of operating in DirectX 12 mode, blocked off the ray tracing settings. Based mostly on different evaluations I’ve seen, I’m not the one one who’s encountered this subject.

Like different RX 6000 playing cards, the RX 6500 XT falls aside with ray tracing turned on. It’s much more of a problem right here than it’s with one thing just like the RX 6600, although. Identical to in uncooked rasterized efficiency, the restricted reminiscence interface turns into a extreme bottleneck.

I hear you: What about FidelityFX Tremendous Decision (FSR)? You want an upscaling device like FSR to get ray tracing working, even on high-end . The issue is that there are only some video games that assist each FSR and ray tracing.

I’m not keen to bend over backward to border the RX 6500 XT as a ray tracing-capable graphics card.

On the time of publication, there are 10 video games that assist each. For context, Nvidia’s Deep Studying Tremendous Sampling (DLSS) reveals up alongside ray tracing in 56 video games. The just lately introduced Radeon Tremendous Decision (RSR) ought to present an upscaling resolution for any sport, but it surely’s not accessible but.

Is ray tracing potential? Certain, however I’m not keen to bend over backward to border the RX 6500 XT as a ray tracing-capable graphics card. In actuality, if you wish to play a sport like Cyperpunk 2077 or Guardians of the Galaxy with ray tracing — and let’s be trustworthy, these are extra fascinating than Godfall and The Medium — you’re out of luck with the RX 6500 XT.

Our take

Don’t purchase. I might throw talks about PCIe and reminiscence bandwidth, low body charges, and the subpar gameplay expertise in opposition to the wall till I’m blue within the face, however that’s not what issues. One of the best factor I can say concerning the RX 6500 XT is that you could find one for round $250.

Even then, you shouldn’t purchase it.

Are there any alternate options?

A number of, all of that are higher. The RTX 3050 is probably the most direct competitor, and it’s much better. You’ll be able to return a number of generations and nonetheless get comparable efficiency, with even the RX 5500 XT coming near the RX 6500 XT.

How lengthy will it final?

Not lengthy. The RX 6500 XT already has extreme bottlenecks in video games which can be a number of years outdated, and people will solely develop into extra exaggerated as time goes on.

Do you have to purchase it?


Editors’ Suggestions

Recommended For You

Main Menu