AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT assessment: Clean 1080p gaming at a 1440p worth

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT review: Smooth 1080p gaming at

AMD RX 6600 XT

MSRP $379.00

“The AMD RX 6600 XT is a stable 1080p card in a time when GPU choices are few and much between.”


Clean gaming at 1080p

Would not require a number of energy

Able to 1440p gaming

Assist for FidelityFX Tremendous Decision


Somewhat too costly

Lackluster content material creation efficiency

Poor ray tracing efficiency

Finances and 1080p avid gamers haven’t had a number of graphics card choices over the previous a number of months, and AMD’s new RX 6600 XT is trying to resolve that downside. It’s a card able to delivering easy 1080p gaming at excessive refresh charges, and it makes use of a cut-down core to assist alleviate some provide points. However its worth stretches the definition of what it means to be a price range graphics card.

Under $500, AMD might have priced the RX 6600 XT nearly anyplace and nonetheless promote playing cards like there’s no tomorrow. At $379, it nestles into a snug place between the Nvidia competitors, and when you can seize one at launch for checklist worth, you received’t discover one other card that performs as properly for the price.

However must you? $379 is a lovely worth given the present market situations, however the RX 6600 XT nonetheless must stack up the competitors as soon as the launch increase is gone. The Radeon RX 6600 XT is a stable card, but it surely’s flanked by two glorious playing cards from Staff Inexperienced that give it a run for its cash.


AMD isn’t releasing a reference design for the RX 6600 XT, so that you’re restricted to choices from board companions. For this assessment, I received my palms on MSI’s RX 6600 XT Gaming X card, which makes use of a standard dual-fan design.

AMD has shared designs from different companions, a few of which embody three followers, however most ought to include two. Whatever the mannequin, the RX 6600 XT makes use of a single Eight-pin energy connector and requires a 500W energy provide at a minimal.

AMD RX 6600 XT sitting on a table.

My unit measured 10.88 inches lengthy, accounting for the marginally protruding shroud. Each mannequin is a bit completely different — particularly the triple-fan ones — so be sure that to verify earlier than choosing one up. A typical dual-fan design shouldn’t be longer than the size of an ATX motherboard (12 inches).

All through testing, the cardboard stayed cool, peaking at round 62 levels Celsius in Cyberpunk 2077. It’s vital to say that I examined inside a Be quiet! Darkish Base Professional 900 rev. 2, which is a full tower chassis with a bit further room for cooling. Your mileage could range.

A welcome characteristic on my assessment unit was a backplate, which is one thing the competing RTX 3060 I examined lacked. Not less than one board associate design has a backplate based mostly on the photographs AMD supplied, however that will not be true for all designs.


The RX 6600 XT builds on AMD’s current RDNA 2 structure, which we have now already seen in motion repeatedly. Nevertheless, it’s constructed utilizing the Navi 23 GPU core, which is in any other case solely out there in AMD’s workstation-class Radeon Professional W6600 and W6600M. That is the Navi 23’s debut for the buyer desktop crowd.

An vital factor to notice about Navi 23 in comparison with earlier variations: It’s a lot smaller. Meaning AMD can squeeze extra GPU dies onto a wafer, which ought to assist provide. It’s nonetheless constructed utilizing chipmaker TSMC’s 7nm node, however with a smaller measurement, AMD is ready to crank out extra chips with every manufacturing move.

Compute Items
Shading items
Recreation Pace
Increase velocity
Reminiscence capability

Radeon RX 6600 XT

Radeon RX 6700 XT

Radeon RX 6800

Radeon RX 6800 XT

Radeon RX 6900 XT

Regardless, Navi 23 is constructed on AMD’s current structure, so we will draw loads of comparisons to the remainder of the vary. In comparison with the following step up, the RX 6600 XT sheds round 20% of the compute items (CUs) for a 20% distinction in worth. That will make sense with all different specs equal, however they’re not. The RX 6600 XT matches the enhance clock velocity of the RX 6700 XT, but it surely comes with 4GB much less GDDR6 reminiscence.

The RX 6600 XT reveals a good worth in comparison with comparable gaps within the vary.

Nonetheless, it’s higher than another steps within the vary. Shifting down from an RX 6800 to an RX 6700 XT, there’s a couple of 20% worth distinction for a 40% distinction in CUs — and that step additionally drops 4GB of RAM. Not less than by AMD’s personal lineup, the RX 6600 XT reveals a good worth in comparison with comparable gaps within the vary.

There isn’t a lot of a cause to attract comparisons to Nvidia on the specs entrance — I’ll dig into the higher model within the upcoming sections. Nevertheless, it’s vital to level out the value of the RX 6600 XT in comparison with the competitors. At $380, it’s sandwiched between Nvidia’s RTX 3060 at $330 and the RTX 3060 Ti at $400.

The RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8GB of reminiscence, too, whereas the RTX 3060 comes with 12GB. With costs in thoughts, the trail ahead is obvious. The RX 6600 XT ought to carry out barely beneath an RTX 3060 Ti and round 20% decrease than the RX 6700 XT. However does it?


1080p benchmarks for RX 6600 XT.

1440p benchmarks for RX 6600 XT.

The RX 6600 XT is concentrating on 1080p, excessive refresh price displays. And based mostly on my common body charges, it hits that mark properly. Throughout the 5 non-ray tracing video games I examined, it averaged 117.6 frames per second (fps), making it an important choice for 1080p displays with a 144Hz refresh price. The 1440p efficiency is barely barely worse with a median of 86.6 fps.

Earlier than attending to particular person outcomes, it’s value trying on the averages I gathered. At 1080p, the RX 6600 XT rests between the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3060 the place it ought to, barely exceeding the efficiency of last-gen’s RX 5700 XT. There’s a couple of 10% distinction between the RX 6600 XT and its closest competitor in worth, the RTX 3060 Ti.

1440p confirmed comparable outcomes, although with a bigger 18% distinction between the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 6600 XT. The RTX 3060 and RX 6600 XT have been a lot nearer with solely a 6% distinction. After all, averages like this don’t inform the total story, so let’s stroll by means of some particular person exams for a clearer image.

I examined the RX 6600 XT with a machine rocking an Intel Core i9-10900Okay, 32GB of RAM, and an Asus Tuf Z490-Plus motherboard. All of my exams have been run off a Essential MX500 2TB onerous drive with the most recent model of Home windows 10. Sadly, I didn’t have an AMD processor to check Sensible Entry Reminiscence, however you may count on a lift of 5-10% in supported video games when you’ve got a latest Ryzen processor.

Beginning with probably the most easy struggle, the RX 6600 XT took house a GPU rating of 9,644 in 3DMark Time Spy. That’s about 11% quicker than RX 5700 XT and RTX 3060, which scored inside a degree of one another on this check. As you’ll see in different exams, the RX 6600 XT will get near the RX 5700 XT in most video games. Right here, it really shoots forward.

The RTX 3060 Ti places the RX 6600 XT again as a replacement, nonetheless. It earned a graphics rating of 11,706 — a couple of 19% distinction. That’s true of the RX 6700 XT, too, which took the crown in 3DMark with a graphics rating of 12,zero68.

AMD RX 6600 XT installed in a computer.

Murderer’s Creed Valhalla is among the video games that favored the RX 6600 XT over the RTX 3060 Ti . At 1080p with Extremely Excessive settings, the RX 6600 XT earned a median of 83 fps. That’s inside one body of the RX 5700 XT, however nonetheless 5 frames forward of the RTX 3060 Ti. The RTX 3060 and RTX 2060 Tremendous trailed the pack at 64 fps and 66 fps, respectively, whereas the RX 6700 XT as soon as once more got here out on high at 100 fps.

At 1440p Extremely Excessive, the RX 6600 XT and RTX 3060 Ti traded locations. The AMD card got here in at 60 fps whereas the Nvidia one got here in at 64 fps. The RTX 3060 was markedly decrease at 51 fps, whereas the RX 6700 XT nonetheless confirmed its dominance at 76 fps. At Excessive settings, I discovered comparable outcomes, with the RX 6600 XT outpacing the RTX 3060 Ti at 1080p however falling quick at 1440p.

The Vulkan-based Pink Lifeless Redemption 2 painted a barely completely different image, with the RX 6600 XT performing nearer to the RTX 3060. The RX 6600 XT averaged 68 fps at 1080p Extremely High quality, whereas the RTX 3060 averaged 65 fps. The RTX 3060 Ti confirmed a 21% distinction in comparison with the RX 6600 XT, averaging 84 fps.

I noticed comparable efficiency at 1440p Extremely High quality, with the RTX 3060 Ti main the pack at 70 fps. The RX 6600 XT confirmed a 24% distinction in comparison with the RTX 3060 Ti with a median body price of 55 fps. Like at 1080p, the RTX 3060 solely barely trailed the RX 6600 XT with a four% distinction between them.

AMD made good on its promise to ship 1080p gaming with excessive body charges.

Civilization VI as soon as once more confirmed a commanding lead for the RTX 3060 Ti, although the RX 6600 XT received nearer than it did in Pink Lifeless Redemption 2. The RX 6600 XT averaged 161 fps at 1080p Extremely settings, whereas the RTX 3060 Ti averaged 194 fps, which is a couple of 19% distinction. The RX 6700 XT shot forward of the opposite playing cards with a 219 fps common.

I noticed comparable scaling at 1440p Extremely. The RX 6600 XT earned 137 fps and the RTX 3060 Ti earned 163 fps, whereas the RTX 3060 trailed at 119 fps. Right here, the RX 6600 XT matches into the spot it ought to — proper in between the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3060.

Battlefield V produced comparable outcomes. The RX 6600 XT averaged 139 fps at 1080p Extremely settings. The RTX 3060 confirmed a 12% distinction at 123 fps, and the RTX 3060 Ti confirmed a 9% distinction at 152 fps. The RX 6700 XT as soon as once more got here out on high at 164 fps.

At 1440p Extremely settings, the RTX 3060 Ti pushed even additional forward of the RX 6600 XT. AMD’s card averaged 100 fps and Nvidia’s averaged 123 fps — virtually a 21% distinction. The RTX 3060 was near the RX 6600 XT at 97 fps, whereas last-gen’s RX 5700 XT scored a barely increased 110 fps.

AMD RX 6600 XT on a wooden backdrop.

Fortnite confirmed a tighter race between the RX 6600 XT, RTX 3060, and RTX 3060 Ti. The RTX 3060 Ti lead at 1080p Epic settings at 143 fps, however the RX 6600 XT wasn’t far behind at 137 fps (solely a four% distinction). The RTX 3060 trailed the group at 132 fps. All three playing cards scored far above the RTX 2060 Tremendous and RX 5700 XT — each of which by no means broke 110 fps —  displaying some clear enhancements from the earlier era.

The 1440p Epic confirmed a extra commanding lead for the RTX 3060 Ti, the place it averaged 100 fps. That’s about 21% off the RX 6600 XT, which averaged 81 fps. The RTX 3060 is a greater level of comparability to the RX 6600 XT at 1440p with its 86 fps common.

Total, you may count on a couple of 10% distinction in efficiency between the RX 6600 XT and the RTX 3060 playing cards, stacking in the way in which their costs would recommend. At 1080p, you’re buying and selling a couple of 5% distinction in worth for a 10% distinction in efficiency between the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 6600 XT. Bringing within the RTX 3060, it’s a 14% distinction in worth for about an 11% distinction in efficiency.

Inside AMD’s personal vary, the RX 6600 XT performs because it ought to given the specs. Even with the reminiscence hole between the 2 playing cards, the RX 6700 XT and RX 6600 XT present a couple of 20% distinction.

After I convey within the earlier era, nonetheless, the RX 6600 XT reveals some issues. The RX 6600 XT solely barely outclassed the RX 5700 XT in my exams, which launched two years in the past for $399. The RX 6600 XT is barely $20 cheaper and solely barely extra highly effective. It consists of ray tracing, which the RX 5700 XT lacked, however this isn’t precisely the generational enchancment I might have favored to see.

Nonetheless, AMD made good on its promise to ship 1080p gaming with excessive body charges, even when there are some barely higher choices from Nvidia at checklist costs.

Content material creation

Gaming is the concentrate on the RX 6600 XT, so it’s not shocking that the cardboard takes a backseat in relation to content material creation. Right here, I ran exams utilizing Blender’s benchmark and PugetBench for Premiere Professional. The RX 6600 XT is able to operating each applications, however there may be a greater choice when you’re targeted on them greater than gaming.

PugetBench for Premiere Pro benchmarks.

Blender benchmarks.

In Blender, I ran three check renders and averaged the instances. The RTX 3060 Ti unsurprisingly leads with help for CUDA and OptiX rendering in Blender. The RX 6600 XT nonetheless managed to beat out the RTX 3060, nonetheless, with about an 11% distinction between them. Nonetheless, the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 6700 XT confirmed a transparent lead.

PugetBench for Premiere Professional favored the Nvidia playing cards much more. The RX 6600 XT scored final with an total rating of 625, whereas the RTX 3060 Ti scored 807. Take into account that PugetBench takes into consideration a bunch of features in Premiere Professional, so the ultimate rating isn’t solely on the shoulders of the graphics card.

I used to be shocked to see the RX 6600 XT present up a bit in my Blender check, however total, it’s not an important card for content material creation. It’s highly effective sufficient to operate in apps like Blender and Premiere Professional, however when you use these functions rather a lot, Nvidia nonetheless holds the lead.

Tremendous Decision and ray tracing

Usually, Nvidia would have a transparent lead over AMD with Deep Studying Tremendous Sampling (DLSS) and ray tracing. That’s not the case for this era. The RX 6600 XT additionally comes with hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and it has entry to a DLSS-like characteristic within the type of FidelityFX Tremendous Decision (FSR).

I took to Management and Cyberpunk 2077 to check ray tracing. I ignored DLSS for all the exams to see how the RX 6600 XT would maintain up in a good battle. True to different playing cards within the RX 6000 vary, it fell clearly wanting the Nvidia competitors.

Cyberpunk 2077 ray tracing benchmarks.

Control ray tracing benchmarks.

In Cyberpunk 2077, the RX 6600 XT confirmed a couple of 79% drop when shifting from the Extremely preset to the Extremely RT preset, whereas the RTX 3060 solely confirmed a 53% drop. Take into account that is with DLSS off. Even with out an upscaling benefit, Nvidia’s RTX 30-series playing cards deal with ray tracing higher than the RX 6000-series.

1440p Extremely RT was unplayable throughout all of the playing cards I examined. For reference, the RX 6600 XT averaged solely three fps on this mode. The highest-performing card, the RTX 3060 Ti, averaged solely 23 fps.

Ray tracing is demanding whatever the hardware you apply it to, however Nvidia’s playing cards can nonetheless deal with the warmth higher than AMD’s.

Management was far more forgiving. It’s at the very least playable with ray tracing turned on at 1080p, however the RX 6600 XT nonetheless confirmed a 54% drop, and the RTX 3060 confirmed solely a 38% drop.

At 1440p, the RX 6600 XT dropped by 62% with ray tracing turned on — 47 fps to 18 fps — whereas the RTX 3060 dropped by 40%. I used the RTX 3060 as a degree of comparability as a result of it was the closest competitor in these exams, however the RTX 3060 Ti confirmed comparable drops when turning on ray tracing.

The distinction right here is smart. Nvidia makes use of devoted ray-tracing cores, whereas AMD opts for a “ray accelerator” packed into every compute unit. Ray tracing is demanding whatever the hardware you apply it to, however Nvidia’s playing cards can nonetheless deal with the warmth higher than AMD’s — and the RX 6600 XT doesn’t change that.

AMD RX 6600 XT on top of other graphics cards.

Within the case of an Nvidia card, I’d level to DLSS as a option to enhance ray tracing efficiency. AMD has another within the type of FSR, however Nvidia normally bundles ray tracing with DLSS, whereas FSR is a bit far and wide. That would change down the road, however Nvidia’s playing cards nonetheless have the most effective set of options for ray tracing.

As my exams present, you really want an upscaling characteristic to run ray tracing at playable body charges. AMD has that characteristic now within the type of FSR, however many standard ray tracing titles — Cyberpunk 2077 and Management included — don’t help the characteristic but.

Nonetheless, FSR is on the market to you with the RX 6600 XT. As we present in our FidelityFX Tremendous Decision assessment, it’s a really succesful upscaling characteristic that may critically enhance your body charges. The picture high quality isn’t fairly nearly as good as DLSS, however the variations are simple to forgive as soon as every thing is up and operating.

Our take

In an ideal world with checklist costs and GPUs on retailer cabinets, I’d definitely advocate the RTX 3060 Ti over the RX 6600 XT. It’s solely $20 dearer and virtually universally performs higher. The RX 6600 XT is barely overpriced at $380 — given its efficiency, it ought to clock in nearer to $350. Nevertheless, an additional $30 is tough to argue with given how costly graphics playing cards are proper now.

Lots of that is going to return all the way down to what card yow will discover, and for what worth. At launch for checklist worth, the RX 6600 XT is a slam dunk given the going price of graphics playing cards. As soon as the preliminary inventory is gone, it is best to slot the RX 6600 XT in between the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3060 when it comes to efficiency and take the asking worth from there.

Is there a greater different?

Sure, the RTX 3060 Ti is a greater different. Nevertheless, given the costs of graphics playing cards and the problem to find them, the checklist worth doesn’t imply a lot. If the RX 6600 XT worth finally ends up between the RTX 3060 and RTX 3060 Ti, it’s an important 1080p card for top refresh price displays.

The opposite different is the RX 6700 XT, which outclasses even the RTX 3060 Ti, although at a premium.

How lengthy will it final?

The RX 6600 XT ought to final for the following a number of years for 1080p gaming. If you wish to use options like ray tracing or improve to a better decision, you’ll most likely really feel the weaknesses of the RX 6600 XT inside a couple of years.

Must you purchase it?

Sure. The RX 6600 XT is about $30 too costly, but it surely’s nonetheless less expensive than some other card you should purchase proper now. In the event you miss the launch increase, nonetheless, think about upgrading to the RTX 3060 Ti as a substitute if yow will discover it for a good worth.

Editors’ Suggestions

Recommended For You

Main Menu