No products in the cart.
After the White Home was pressured to reveal final week that Hope Hicks had examined constructive for COVID-19 and, a number of hours later, that Donald Trump and the primary woman had as nicely, the shut aide to the president was stated to be upset that the information protection steered that she had given her boss the virus. “It’s so unfair she’s kind of being blamed,” a good friend of Hicks’s informed my colleague Gabriel Sherman. On the time, it was unclear when or how the president had contracted the illness, and now, 5 days later, it nonetheless is—largely as a result of the White Home has refused to say when Trump final examined detrimental for COVID-19 and rejected the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention’s help in utilizing an investigative measure confirmed to assist establish the supply of an outbreak and all these affected. Which might be as a result of they don’t wish to admit that the president wasn’t examined practically as usually because the administration steered, or: that he examined constructive sooner than it was revealed to the general public and is probably affected person zero of the outbreak that has contaminated not less than 27 individuals in his interior circle.
Talking to Don Lemon on Tuesday night time, Jonathan Reiner, M.D., a professor of drugs and surgical procedure at George Washington College College of Medication, stated, “I feel we’ve actually began to place collectively the timeline right here and that is what I feel it’s. To start with there’s no likelihood the president was examined earlier than the controversy, I feel that’s fairly clear. He was symptomatic on Thursday night time and it takes a few week after an infection to get sick sufficient to be admitted to the hospital. So I feel the president was contaminated with the coronavirus for not less than per week earlier than he was admitted to the hospital. That takes him to the top of the prior week, earlier than the super-spreader occasion. The foundations of the controversy required either side to listing all of their attendees and to doc that they’d been examined inside 72 hours. There’s no likelihood that that occurred with the president. I feel he’s the super-spreader. And I feel the explanation the White Home won’t have the CDC do a proper examine and overview each single case is that they’re involved that the affected person zero is likely to be the president of the USA.”
In fact, Reiner is merely speculating, however as Jake Tapper famous in a Twitter thread on Wednesday, the White Home‘s refusal to say when the president final examined detrimental actually isn’t acceptable at this level, given the truth that it’s “a public well being challenge” as a result of the president is contagious, and the one justification seems to be the president’s lackeys repeating the speaking level that they don’t “wish to go backwards.” In the meantime, in response to the Wall Avenue Journal, Trump has a historical past of attempting to maintain COVID-positive check outcomes a secret:
Because the virus unfold among the many individuals closest to him, Mr. Trump additionally requested one adviser to not disclose outcomes of their very own constructive check. “Don’t inform anybody,” Mr. Trump stated, in response to an individual conversant in the dialog.
Mr. Trump and his prime advisers additionally aimed to maintain such an in depth maintain on the early constructive outcomes that his marketing campaign supervisor, Invoice Stepien, didn’t know that Hope Hicks, one of many president’s closest White Home aides, had examined constructive on Thursday morning till information reviews later that night, in response to an individual conversant in the matter.
In different phrases, it’s not laborious to think about a situation through which Trump examined constructive for COVID-19 nicely earlier than he was pressured to reveal it to the general public, and it’s attainable we wouldn’t have identified about it in any respect had Hicks’s case not been reported, forcing his hand. (Because the New York Occasions reported final week, “White Home officers had hoped to maintain the information about Ms. Hicks from turning into public, to no avail.”)
In fact, there’s a solution to kill the hypothesis that Trump not solely knowingly had the virus when he debated Joe Biden, but in addition throughout all the following occasions after that, together with a Minnesota rally and a gathering with donors in Bedminster, New Jersey, which might be to launch proof of his detrimental exams throughout that point interval. However, for some unusual motive, the White Home doesn’t wish to try this. On Wednesday, White Home Deputy Communications Director Brian Morgensterninformed reporters that the aim of contact tracing isn’t to “return and establish affected person zero,” which isn’t true in any respect, as figuring out affected person zero would assist hint who that particular person got here in touch with to stop the additional unfold of the virus.
Anyway, right here’s a letter from the president’s super-trustworthy physician, which begins by taking Trump’s personal phrase for it that he’s in excellent well being:
And, in associated information, the White Home employees apparently stays undeterred in its quest to lift the West Wing an infection charge to 100%:
Extra Nice Tales From Self-importance Truthful
— Progressives Are Going Rogue to Flip Pennsylvania for Biden
— White Home Reporters Fume Over Group Trump’s “Reckless” COVID Response
— Why Anti–Trump Assault Adverts Would possibly Really Be Serving to Him
— Tax Mess Apart, Can Trump Pay Off His $1 Billion in Debt?
— Information Media Begins to Ponder a Submit–Trump White Home
— The Kimberly Guilfoyle Sexual Harassment Allegations Get Even Darker
— As Trump Falters, Democrats See an Increasing 2020 Senate Map
— From the Archive: Inside Trump’s Twisted, Epic Battle for Mar-a-Lago
— Not a subscriber? Be a part of Self-importance Truthful to obtain full entry to VF.com and the whole on-line archive now.
Recommended For You
